Starmer admits No 10 discussed potential diplomatic role for aide Matthew Doyle

Background to the controversy

Sir Keir Starmer revealed that talks occurred regarding a possible diplomatic post for his longtime advisor, Matthew Doyle. Doyle, who served as the former communications director, was elevated to a Labour peer following his departure from Downing Street in March 2025. However, his career faced a setback in February when he was temporarily barred from the parliamentary party due to ties with a convicted sex offender.

The issue resurfaced during Sir Olly Robbins’ testimony to the Foreign Affairs Committee. Robbins, who was dismissed by Starmer last week amid disputes over Lord Mandelson’s US ambassador nomination, raised the matter. He claimed that the prime minister’s office had explored appointing Doyle to a foreign service position, though the details remain unclear.

“When people leave roles in any organisation there are often conversations about other roles they want to apply for, but nothing came of this.” – Sir Keir Starmer

Doyle’s response and the ongoing debate

Lord Doyle denied seeking a diplomatic role, stating he was unaware of any discussions with the Foreign Office about his candidacy. During Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs), Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey and Conservative MP Mike Wood pressed Starmer on whether Downing Street had considered such a move.

Starmer defended the process, emphasizing Doyle’s years of public service. He noted that while roles are often discussed after departures, the opportunity for Doyle didn’t materialize. Meanwhile, the Conservatives criticized the situation, accusing the government of favoritism and an “Old Boy’s Club” mentality.

“He promised them [Labour MPs] probity; what he has given them is cronyism and an Old Boy’s Club where Matthew Doyle is being proposed as an ambassador.” – Kemi Badenoch, Conservative leader

Context of the sacking and security clearance

The controversy surrounding Sir Olly Robbins’ dismissal has intensified. The former Foreign Office head had granted Lord Mandelson security clearance for the top diplomatic post in January 2025, despite concerns during the vetting process. Mandelson assumed the role in February but was later removed after his connections to Jeffrey Epstein, a late convicted sex offender, were uncovered.

At PMQs, Badenoch challenged Starmer’s assertion that due process was followed. She argued the PM had not adhered to proper procedures, contrasting his claims with the allegations against Doyle. Labour MPs supported Starmer, chanting “wrong, wrong, wrong” as he refuted her criticisms, citing past mistakes in the Iran war as evidence of her tendency to rush to conclusions.

The foreign affairs select committee has announced that Morgan McSweeney, the former Downing Street chief of staff who resigned over his role in Mandelson’s appointment, will testify next week. This development adds another layer to the ongoing political scrutiny. Sign up for the Politics Essential newsletter to stay informed about critical updates and analysis from across the UK.