Ban ‘forever chemicals’ in uniforms and frying pans, MPs urge

Members of Parliament have proposed a complete ban on the use of PFAS chemicals in school uniforms and non-stick cookware, unless their application is deemed unavoidable or an alternative exists. These substances, known for their water and stain-resistant qualities, are prevalent in a wide range of products. However, their persistent nature has raised alarm about potential environmental harm and health risks.

The House of Commons’ Environmental Audit Committee highlighted that while PFAS offer unmatched durability, their resistance to breakdown means they accumulate in ecosystems over time. This has led to concerns about their long-term impact, with some studies linking them to chronic health issues. The committee’s recommendations have been welcomed by environmental advocates and experts, who praised the focus on reducing reliance on these chemicals.

“Nearly all of us will have some level of PFAS in our bodies. But evidence we heard throughout our inquiry suggests that our dependence on PFAS has come with a cost to the environment, and perhaps to human health too,” said Toby Perkins, chair of the Environment Audit Committee.

The government is reviewing the proposals but has already unveiled its own PFAS strategy, emphasizing “decisive action” to address the issue. While the plan includes measures for monitoring and guidance, the committee argued it does not adequately tackle the root of contamination. They urged a shift from tracking pollution to actively eliminating it.

PFAS encompass over 15,000 synthetic substances, widely used in both critical applications and everyday items. From medical devices to raincoats, their versatility makes them indispensable. Yet, this same resilience causes them to linger in the environment, potentially harming ecosystems and human health.

“It’s staggering, they’re in so many products. A lot of the time, they’re put in from a convenience point of view, like stain-resistant properties, so that’s why they’re in school uniforms, but consumers don’t know,” noted Dr. Dave Megson, a chemistry expert at Manchester Met University.

The committee suggested phasing out non-essential PFAS uses by 2027, including items such as food packaging and clothing. This would allow for safer alternatives. Environmental groups and academics praised the move, calling it a necessary step to protect public health and the planet.

Industry representatives, however, contested the recommendations. Tobias Gerfin of the European Cookware, Cutlery, and Houseware Industries Federation argued that banning non-stick pans could lead to increased food waste. Meanwhile, the EU plans to approve a similar restriction soon, prompting warnings that the UK may lag if it does not act.

Chloe Topping of Fidra, an environmental charity, noted the UK’s limited resources compared to the EU, which could hinder its ability to address PFAS contamination effectively. Despite this, the government remains open to the committee’s suggestions, with a Defra spokesperson stating: “The first ever PFAS Plan shows the decisive action we are taking to better understand and tackle the sources of these chemicals, including through better guidance and monitoring, tougher rules on their use, and support for transitioning to safer alternatives.”